
Why the Name 'Monkeypox' Was Retired
In 2022, a significant shift occurred in the naming of the viral disease previously known as monkeypox. The World Health Organization (WHO) moved to retire the term 'monkeypox,' replacing it with 'mpox' for two primary reasons: accuracy and to mitigate stigma. The disease's primary hosts are rodents and small mammals—not monkeys—making the old name misleading. Additionally, there were concerns that the term 'monkeypox' evoked racial stereotypes and contributed to discrimination against communities in Africa, where the virus is endemic.
The U.S. Reversion: A Step Backward?
Despite this progressive move, the U.S. has recently decided to revert to using the term 'monkeypox.' This has raised eyebrows among health professionals. Dr. Joseph Cherabie, an infectious disease specialist at Washington University, expressed confusion about the change, stating, "The first question is: 'Why?' It doesn't make any sense." Dr. Boghuma Titanji, an infectious disease physician at Emory University, echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that the reversion is confusing and unnecessary. The switch appears to defy the consensus within the public health community, which largely supports the use of 'mpox.'
Behind the Terminology Conflict
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) maintains that 'monkeypox' is the name of the disease caused by the monkeypox virus, a stance that is counter to WHO guidelines. Dr. Daniel Bausch, a professor at the Geneva Graduate Institute, remarked on this inconsistency, suggesting that the U.S. might either be misinformed about the naming conventions or unwilling to follow the WHO's recommendations. There's no official clarification from HHS about why this switch back occurred.
Historical Context: The First Cases
The origins of the name 'monkeypox' date back to 1958 when the virus was first identified in laboratory monkeys in Denmark. However, the first human case arose in 1970 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, leading to an increased interest in the virus and its transmission. Understanding the distinction between its historical significance and its present implications helps contextualize the sensitivity surrounding the name.
Societal Implications of Names
The importance of language in public health cannot be overstated. Terms that carry stigma can adversely affect how communities respond to outbreaks and public health messaging. Dr. Titanji pointed out that terms like 'monkeypox' can lead to discrimination against individuals from certain backgrounds, even those unrelated to the disease. Such discussions spotlight the need for careful consideration of how terminology influences societal perceptions. More than just a name, these terms carry weight that can either harm or help public understanding.
Future Outlook: What Lies Ahead?
As we navigate this complex terrain, experts agree that fostering an inclusive dialogue about disease naming is essential. Continued advocacy for evidence-based terminology in public health communications can pave the way for better management of health crises. The mixed reception of the term 'monkeypox' demonstrates that names contribute significantly to the stigma surrounding diseases.
Making Informed Decisions in Health Communications
This unfolding situation regarding the naming of the monkeypox virus serves as a cautionary tale for health agencies and communicators. Strategic naming can enhance public engagement and understanding. As more focus is placed on health communications, industry leaders—especially within tech and marketing—should take notice of this lesson: embrace accurate, sensitive language to engage and educate effectively. Clear communication not only aids in comprehension but also fosters a more empathetic public discourse around sensitive health issues.
Write A Comment